From the first line of the Bitcoin Whitepaper's Abstract:
"A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution" (emphasis added)
A purely peer-to-peer VERSION of e cash.... In other words, NOT e cash itself, but a VERSION.
Cash was just likely the closest, most easy thing to it that we could comprehend, that was Like BTC, but not it.
See, others ADDED all this "It's supposed to BE cash." And latched on to that like wildfire. Why would you want CASH?? We already HAVE THAT!!! That word was probably used, like I said, bc what it btc was too new, too foreign of a concept, so calling it "cash" would be easier. So they said CASH.
BCH says they're trying to "preserve" and "maintain what BTC was "supposed" to be, and I'm not here to presume intentions.. But imo, intentionally or not, vying to "stay cash" is NOT bitcoin. it is, as the whitepaper itself clearly states (to use your own favorite argument against you :) merely a Version....
[link] [comments]
from Bitcoin - The Internet of Money https://ift.tt/2F2vrou
No comments:
Post a Comment
We have received your message and would like to thank you for writing to us, we will reply by email as soon as possible.
Talk to you soon,
[Pakcoin Worker]
[Pakcoin Global]